Logan Act probably more than Espionage Act.
-
-
En réponse à @emptywheel @sarahjeong
the people need an explainer stat
2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @luis_in_brief
now that
@emptywheel mentions it, it's pretty self-explanatory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act#Text …@sarahjeong2 réponses 8 Retweets 8 j'aime -
Does hacking Clinton's private server rise to action against US state?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
it wouldn't have to. just has to relate "to any disputes or controversies" w/US.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
Is there precedent for elections counting as disputes or controversies? (sincere ?)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
I'm not a natsec lawyer. But I think hacking SoS email is likely a "controversy."
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @copiesofcopies @CapturetheOcean et
no prosecutor will actually touch with 10' pole. But it'd be interesting on appeal.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @luis_in_brief @CapturetheOcean et
yeah, this is definitely a thought exercise. and even then we're flattering ourselves.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @copiesofcopies @CapturetheOcean et
but still, utterly batshit that this is a thought exercise we can have in YOOL 2016
3 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
yeah this is all academic af but ooooooh myyyyy goddddd
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.