3) imo unfair to Gawker's legitimately good journalistic achievements (which coexist alongside some extremely bad journalism)
-
-
-
4) the entire gist is "hold up, there are some troubling aspects to this thing that I myself have also experienced schadenfeude over" -->
-
5) backlash is interesting because backlash can therefore be summarized as people who are mad about having to hold up and think for a second
-
interesting that I am getting more "eh, fuck them" pushback here than on anything I can remember.
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
i am reliably informed i am a gawker-loving jerk and i suck
-
your a dick, etc
-
let's see how I feel when
@gawker pays someone to describe MY pubic hair
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I will cheer Gawker's downfall. They broke the law; now they're getting punished. Justice if upon us.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
has
@Popehat weighed in on whether he thought the verdict was justified? -
No, that's a separate and very long and complicated post. Not suitable for 800 word limit.
-
Okay; just wondered if you'd written it somewhere else. Thanks!
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.