Anyways, seems like a good time to bump this—the story of how Mother Jones got sued by a billionaire political donorhttp://www.motherjones.com/media/2015/10/mother-jones-vandersloot-melaleuca-lawsuit …
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Remember, Mother Jones burned millions of dollars defending themselves in a bogus defamation suit filed by a billionaire Republican donor.
2 réponses 117 Retweets 117 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This wasn't the subject of the suit, but it's worth saying...
1 réponse 17 Retweets 18 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
The billionaire was probably most steamed about a secretly recorded video published w/o the subject's consent: the Romney 47% video
2 réponses 35 Retweets 57 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Yeah, what Gawker did is not at all in the moral ballpark, and that's why they actually went to trial and lost.
5 réponses 33 Retweets 54 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
The point is that the Thiel strategy is replicable against many publications and the knowledge that it's replicable is a chilling effect
7 réponses 81 Retweets 86 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I have no answer to countering the Thiel strategy btw aside from making it that no one has that much more money than anyone else
11 réponses 36 Retweets 67 j'aime
have a great day and enjoy the society we've built!!!!!!!!!!! 





-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.