SLR says it would be an injunction under Rule 23(b)(2). Chen turns to Boutrous: You agree that could be brought?
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Boutrous kind of laughs. "I’m going to say no as a cautionary matter."
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
SLR says re: the worker classification issue, a driver can opt-out and "go it alone," and that's something that happens in other cases.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Boutrous says that, "This settlement is a landmark and it advances the entire enterprise [of the legal system]."
1 réponse 1 Retweet 2 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
We're now discussing the potential value of a PAGA claim (Private Attorney General Act).
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
There are so many lawyers standing at the front now, it's like two layers deep now. Layers of lawyers
7 réponses 1 Retweet 23 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
We're now unraveling what it means if the 2013 and 2014 arbitration clauses are ruled to be binding by the 9th Cir.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Lawyers and judge now talking slowly and carefully because it's a huge pain.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
We're still trapped in what happens to the arbitration clauses after the settlement, and it is hard
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
The front is 3 layers deep now. It's 5 and I'm very hungry, so I'm going to head out.
-
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I polished off my secret Luna bar stash too soon and had to leave.
0 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.