SLR says that the worker's comp's claim is "novel" and there is no precedent for it.
-
-
SLR says it would be an injunction under Rule 23(b)(2). Chen turns to Boutrous: You agree that could be brought?
-
Boutrous kind of laughs. "I’m going to say no as a cautionary matter."
-
SLR says re: the worker classification issue, a driver can opt-out and "go it alone," and that's something that happens in other cases.
-
Boutrous says that, "This settlement is a landmark and it advances the entire enterprise [of the legal system]."
-
"I don't want that to get lost."
-
We're now discussing the potential value of a PAGA claim (Private Attorney General Act).
-
There are so many lawyers standing at the front now, it's like two layers deep now. Layers of lawyers
-
We're now unraveling what it means if the 2013 and 2014 arbitration clauses are ruled to be binding by the 9th Cir.
-
Lawyers and judge now talking slowly and carefully because it's a huge pain.
-
We're still trapped in what happens to the arbitration clauses after the settlement, and it is hard
-
The front is 3 layers deep now. It's 5 and I'm very hungry, so I'm going to head out.
-
The judge is starting to sound hangry too
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.