YEP. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/27/silicon-valley-billionaires-peter-thiel-gawker-first-amendment-journalism …pic.twitter.com/YdT06211qP
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
Once I saw a GGer yelling about how the New Yorker needed some fact-checkers.
I didn't see very many people argue WSJ-Theranos was clickbait. @sarahjeonghttps://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/737359078603653122 …
well, VCs still managed to blame the Theranos disaster on clickbait anyhowpic.twitter.com/qmGQGc2nlR
I think the bigger issue is that it's hard for reporters to find negative sources who talk publicly.
in media or politics there's always someone willing to take a shot at a rival. We don't do that.
so the press wants validation from other technical people and they don't get it.
It's almost like everything becomes clickbait when someone lacks the self-control not to click but also the patience to read 
Good thing the internet will never breed a hive mind of impulsive individuals with a short attention span for facts or anything
Aren't newspaper headlines just physical clickbait?
Same thing that racist PEGIDA trashfire here in Germany does. Everything they disagree with is "Lügenpresse", the "lying press"
Stuff coming from Russia Today or from the right-wing Politically Incorrect blog, that's "finally some real journalism"
Old white man falling for clickbait! at the failing @nytimes
My wife married me because clickbait
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.