so, thiel felt the need to keep his financing of these lawsuits top secret for a decade but also he did nothing wrong, clearly. clearly
-
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
I have to disagree. I think you are confusing procedure & substance. If Gawker's actions were legitimately tortious, no problem
-
I'm not discussing procedure or substance. I'm discussing policy implications.
-
Policy has to address either procedure or substance.
@sarahjeong -
No, it doesn't. Because it doesn't have to deal with the courts at all, it can create law or quasi-law anew.
-
It can also point to something broken without making specific recommendations.
-
Frankly, I am uncomfortable with the outcome myself. But I think that is about the substance of defamation law.
-
I disagree. I think
@grimmelm's tweets on the matter are on the money.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Most of the time, litigation funding levels playing field of weaker parties against stronger. That's when it is needed.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
That’s what I’ve been thinking too.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.