so, thiel felt the need to keep his financing of these lawsuits top secret for a decade but also he did nothing wrong, clearly. clearly
-
-
This might just be an inevitable consequence of an adversarial court system under plutocracypic.twitter.com/ImhP7shLwQ
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Perhaps require disclosure of outside litigation funding. But its existence is legal per supreme court in 1964
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Maybe just mandatory disclosure of litigation finance (the same way that parties must disclose if they have insurance coverage)
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
His motivation clear, Gawker personly targeted him with a click-bait story so he backed Hogans defamation lawsuit.
-
The fact that he funded Hulk's case doesn't change the facts of the case either.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
couldn't we at least prevent people from *anonymously* funding someone else's lawsuit?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.