My piece on the verdict is here: http://motherboard.vice.com/read/google-wins-trial-against-oracle-saves-9-billion … Earlier piece about implications of fair use here:http://motherboard.vice.com/read/why-the-very-silly-oracle-v-google-trial-actually-matters …
-
-
Not everywhere, even in the USA. To win you'd always need to throw in a patent to appeal to the Federal Circuit.
-
Yep. But not hard to do.
-
And no explicit circuit split between 9th and Fed. Yet.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
So what does that practically mean at this point? I can reimplement the copyrighted API, paint a picture of it, what can't I do?
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
i'm worried about this. could att copyright what is now the posix api because they did it first?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I wonder if that represents an illegal tariff barrier for European software companies?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Aw shit! New field of play for lawyers to get rich and innovation/cooperation to wither.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
For now.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
it's kind of a pain in the ass, but APIs that're meant to be used are probably just going to start coming with copyleft.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
does this mean a license could stipulate compatible software's restrictions?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.