The @owenthomas post for @Gawker "outing" Peter Thiel; smart, well written, not sure why it would make Thiel mad:http://bit.ly/1Z1hV6o
-
-
While it wasn't publicized, it wasn't a secret. Thiel seems to have disagreed re: closet status.
-
if he disagreed, doesn't that matter..And if not secret, why lead with that as the news peg
-
That was the cleverness of
@owenthomas's piece - the meta-ness of it all. -
wherein lies the meta?
-
Oy. Maybe I'll explain after Twitter lifts character limit. But really, res ipsa loquitur.
-
@gabrielarana 1. Not already out (open secret). 2. Not a public figure. 3. No broader import. -
fair enough--you agree on the second case being a non-meta unacceptable outing
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Huh. Kinda sounds like Thiel disagreed!
-
The outing was not okay, but I don't understand this epic, decade-long mega-grudge.
-
I would propose there was no "outing" here, but that is a longer conversation than 140 characters.
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Correct.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.