this seems questionably ethical http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/business/dealbook/peter-thiel-tech-billionaire-reveals-secret-war-with-gawker.html?_r=1 …pic.twitter.com/OH2RICRiA8
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
So what are the odds that attorney client privilege has ended up waived as a result of Thiel's involvement?
i don't know, you tell me!!!!
Privilege not automatically lost if someone else pays lawyers, but there's none if Thiel was in room when Hulk spoke to lawyers.
do you think Thiel and Bollaea were ever in the same room together? Because that's already got me dizzy
This arrangement, if true, is so bizarre, seems like Thiel might have inserted himself fairly thoroughly. How much is the big q.
I don't think the "if true" is a question anymore, since Thiel admitted it to the Times.
while funding lawsuits is legal, there's no penalty or censure for hiding a Real Party of Interest?
i believe judge has been blocking gawker from finding out. these news stories are coming out of journalistic work, not court
@anildash was commenting that this is some bond villain shit & the interview confirms it in every way http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/business/dealbook/peter-thiel-tech-billionaire-reveals-secret-war-with-gawker.html?_r=0 …
Given Gawker is... Well, Gawker, I can't help but see him as more Bond than Bond villain.
What if… Gawker is terrible AND it's terrible that Thiel is trying to extinguish them w/ litigation?
Not unreasonable.
Fiduciary duty for thee but not for me!
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.