heh... the Phillips screwdriver head was covered by patents when first delivered...
-
-
heh, correct, but still in the same grand family of IP law, you'd concede. Did you compare/contrast w/SUN v MSFT?
@derektmead -
patents cover functionality, copyright explicitly excludes functionality. that's the point I make in my article.
-
Your article is good - it's lacking the legal fair use definition though :-( Profiting off others work is excluded?
@derektmead -
commerciality does not exclude fair use.
-
see e.g., the Google Books ruling (2d Cir)
-
Hence the question mark. Is there limits and caveats on that ruling though e.g. excerpt length etc?
@derektmead - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.