Schwartz official statements about supporting Android, etc.
-
-
Factor 1: Highly transformative Factor 2: Functional Factor 3: Tiny Fraction Factor 4: Not a substitute
-
AND THEN HE ADDS ANOTHER ROW that says "Other Factors" lmao and it says "Good faith industry practice"
-
The weight of Google's evidence in this FAIR USE TRIAL has been on Factor 2 and "Other Factors"

-
Now going through Sun's failures to build Java-based smartphones.
-
And now, the Oracle failures.
-
I'd call this a low blow except Oracle's the one that sued for $9 billion.
-
Van Nest takes a moment to distinguish Douglas Schmidt (Oracle expert witness) from Eric Schmidt (Google top hat man)
-
Making the transformative argument by telling the story of how engineers picked and chose specific APIs, wrote own implementing code,
-
added libraries, etc. that were aimed specifically at smartphones. (Think cameras etc)
-
Using Dalvik and Linux kernel as well.
-
"At the end of the day there's virtually nothing in common with Android and Java SE."
-
Bizarrely, story of transformative use also resembles an argument that it's too functional to be copyrightable
-
What a weird case.
-
"Even their expert, Mr. Jaffe, called Android 'a feat not achieved by any other tech giant.'"
-
Google closing argument does hint a little at Google exceptionalism, but not in an uncouth way.
-
(Just thinking about that because I would *love* to hear more about that bat mitzvah)
-
Briefly mentioned at trial, actually.https://twitter.com/badlogicgames/status/734776051176443905 …
-
Two possibilities here: 1) barred as irrelevant 2) Google decided too confusing for juryhttps://twitter.com/badlogicgames/status/734776051176443905 …
-
"iPhones are very successful and they don't use Java at all."
-
We're still on Google's closing arguments. Now taking bets that Oracle will say the exact same thing to support THEIR case.
-
Now going over how Java SE market is doing just fine.
-
On Jaffe (the Oracle economist): "He didn’t do his homework. We know that. It was embarrassing."
-
Again reiterating difference to SE and ME, and how ME is for flip phones.
-
Van Nest says that only harm Oracle has claimed is to the Java ME market.
-
(This isn't quite true, Oracle's theory is that they WOULD have created a SE phone platform but Android was too far ahead, no fair)
-
Now going over internal Sun projections that Sun revenues were going to drop anyways, Android didn't affect them.
-
Points to Astrachan's statement that Java is the #1 programming lang in the world. "Not only is SE doing fine, the language is doing fine."
-
Van Nest says every witness/expert said that reimplementing APIs was common, that everyone did it.
-
We're going through specific examples of how others in the industry reimplemented APIs.
-
For example:
- 99 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.