just
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
suggests that a case is more likely to work in Germany. jfkdlajfdklsafjdlsafjdsal
8 réponses 1 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Tortious interference? So users are in breach for adblocking? Good god no
2 réponses 6 Retweets 23 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Especially if traffic is coming in from social. Good luck getting those TOU to be enforceable
1 réponse 1 Retweet 12 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Panelist is being very careful to say these aren't *great* legal arguments, but he keeps saying "creative lawyering."
2 réponses 7 Retweets 18 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This is creative lawyering like monkey selfie is creative lawyering
3 réponses 16 Retweets 67 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
oh my god we're going down a copyright infringement hypo re: adblockers and i want to die
#mlrc6 réponses 10 Retweets 30 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
the copyright theory is that the READER is infringing copyright and the adblocker is inducing "seems like a challenging claim to me"
9 réponses 12 Retweets 25 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Shoutout to the Brave browser. Panelist says that this is the case he'd litigate if he were a publisher.
#MLRC1 réponse 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
"If I were a judge, I'd say, 'What value do you add, you're just an asshole.'"
#MLRC2 réponses 2 Retweets 18 j'aime
Cooper cuts in to clarify that Brave replaces ads with non-tracking ads, takes a cut off the top, and then gives ad $ to publishers #MLRC
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
How dare public not accept more abuse from us accepting crap ads & pushing malware onto them! Spend on lawyers, not better ads!!
0 réponse 1 Retweet 3 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.