Oracle: I'm looking at the report, I don't see the concept of "me too" in here.
-
-
Same with feature phones / smartphones: smartphone consumers do not consider feature phones a substitute.
-
[Objection: What about hipsters]
-
Oracle objects about this testimony too, Alsup doesn't make a ruling, Google says they'll move on. They move on.
-
Leonard continues, but Oracle again objects to it being about "consumer preferences for YouTube" which isn't discussed in the report.
-
Alsup: The answer will stand except for the example of YouTube. You'll have to delete that from your memory.
-
(Leonard was saying people might want to use YouTube on their smartphones; can't do that on their feature phones)
-
Leonard: [Jaffe] made a big deal about how crucial it was to have the 37 APIs. I just disagree with that.
-
Leonard: Java isn't the only programming language out there. Says could have used C++.
-
We're finally talking about Objective-C.
-
Says Objective-C was not as successful before iPhone and now it is.
-
Leonard: It's the other aspects of Android that made it as successful as it is.
-
Direct over, now Oracle's cross.
-
Oracle: Isn't it true that Google told the European Commission that— Google objects that it's a hearsay document.
-
It's true, it's not in evidence.
-
You guys a very exciting trial thing happened
-
Leonard saw this doc in depo, recognized it, and responded to it.
-
So Hurst gets to introduce this document, which Google has successfully blocked THE ENTIRE TRIAL
-
The document says: "There is a single product market for the supply of all mobile devices whether basic or more advanced."
-
BUT IT APPEARS LEONARD IS TRICKSY AND MIGHT KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT THE RULES OF EVIDENCE
-
Leonard: Yes, the [European Commission] said Google said that, but I don’t think I’ve seen Google’s file on itself.
-
IT'S DOUBLE HEARSAY
-
Alsup really bothered by it. Very exciting for me. But it stands. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
-
Double hearsay is the most exciting thing
-
Not sure if Leonard's double hearsay play worked out, since Oracle then got to ask, "BECAUSE GOOGLE DIDN'T SHOW IT TO YOU?
-
The European Commission document is NOT in evidence, it's just that the jury just got to hear that crazy quote
-
Oracle now crossing on Rubin's prior testimony, which is all terrible
-
The questions are basically asking if Rubin's testimony goes towards market harm, etc., whether competitive
-
But it's also a great opportunity to go over damning Rubin testimony
-
Oracle: The Open Handset Alliance did not spring fully-formed from the head of Zeus, did it, sir?
- 78 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.