It does not look like a smart phone.
-
-
En réponse à @xor
Jaffe just almost explained the history of QWERTY before Alsup cut him off. (Would've been from an economist's perspective, of course.)
3 réponses 2 Retweets 34 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Cross exam started with Van Nest calling into question the conclusion that Sun/Oracle was "poised for success" on smartphones.
1 réponse 2 Retweets 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Looking at Sun's materials at the time, and phones like the SavaJe, that was not obvious.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Oracle objects to Google interrupting Jaffe's answers a few times. Van Nest moves on to questions about Java ME.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Google is doing a good job of laying out that Jaffe's analysis conflated a lot of things, and maybe it's because Oracle cherrypicked docs.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Google: When did the SavaJe phone fail? Jaffe: In the mid-2000s. Before Android was even announced.
1 réponse 9 Retweets 27 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Project Acadia, Sundroid… a graveyard of smartphone failures from Sun & Oracle that don't really comport with "poised for success" analysis.
2 réponses 7 Retweets 27 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Has Van Nest done a cross exam yet this trial? I would not like to be on the receiving end of this.
3 réponses 1 Retweet 9 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
He's done this amazing trick where Jaffe's credibility is wrapped up in SavaJe Being Good and it is the easiest target to drag
3 réponses 7 Retweets 38 j'aime
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong @xor
If two people come up with the same joke at the same time in response to events, who gets copyright?
0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.