Had help from 4 different people, including someone who did work for another expert on this case.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
sarah jeong a retweeté sarah jeong
Back to this thing that Google is doing:https://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/732630010293444608 …
sarah jeong ajouté,
1 réponse 2 Retweets 9 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
It's stipulated in this case that Java-the-language is free and open to use
1 réponse 5 Retweets 17 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Apparently in a deposition DS said it wasn't
1 réponse 5 Retweets 14 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
DS: I did not understand what "free and open" meant at the time, I have since learned. UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
5 réponses 13 Retweets 49 j'aime -
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Google continuing with cross and he's actually holding up pretty well but that one part does not seem adequately explained
2 réponses 1 Retweet 10 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
trials are never won or lost based on explanation or evidence - it is only the lawyer's mastery of procedure and appearance.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 1 j'aime
wow, thanks for this extremely insightful and creative comment, man
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
well i learned that the hard way, thinking if i just showed up and told my story we would win. a judge friend later was like ha
0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.