omfg https://bol.bna.com/perspective-oracle-vs-google-trial-highlights-importance-of-privilege-reviews/ …pic.twitter.com/6xjRrtdRMH
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
Catz says "write once; run anywhere" made Java "much more functional" then quickly backpedals and say "sorry, I meant useful." 
Oracle is trying to enter a doc into evidence on business record exception, Alsup refuses on account that there are "too many slides"
Oracle tries to enter a single page from the doc, Alsup looks it over and refuses, says it's still hearsay and not a business record.
Catz says Android had "a very negative impact," that companies like Samsung were going from $40 million licensing deals to $1 million.
Catz gives the example of how Amazon's Kindle Fire used Android and did not license Java.
When Amazon was developing the Paperwhite, it was deciding between (Oracle's) Java and Android. Oracle gave them a 97.5% discount.
lol omg
Catz: ... releasing a phone did not make sense for us. As far as a phone, we were not in that business, and it didn't make sense for it.
As for a phone platform, "Android was so far ahead in the market ... it would be very difficult to compete."
Catz testifies that Oracle has been "forced" to make some of their products compatible with Android uhhhhhhhhh
... any of that involve... ... replicating API labels? By any chance?
(probably not, I'm sure Google would have found out in discovery, but I'm still raising an eyebrow here)
Safra Catz was at a bat mitzvah ("which is like a bar mitzvah but for girls") when she ran into Google's general counsel.
This was March 2012. Catz: He said to me, "Google is a very special company and the old rules don't apply to us."
Catz: I replied, "'Thou shalt not steal' is an oldie but a goodie."
Google: As a general matter, don't you think it's fair that the world should be able to rely on the statements made by CEOs?
Catz: Yeah, it would depend on what I'm talking about.
[we're now in cross btw]
Google: There's been a lot of statements by Chief Executive Officers about your software, yes?
(Basically Google is trying to get Catz to agree that it's fair to rely on Schwartz or Ellison saying Java is free, Androind is good)
10-K report says: "We have also released Java SE, Java EE and Java ME under an open source license."
"... generally open source software licenses permit the liberal copying, modification and distribution of software"
"As a result of such release, there could be an impact on revenue related to this intellectual property"
"... we may no longer be able to exercise control over some aspects of the future development of this IP."
Catz acknowledges Oracle knew these things as they acquired Sun.
Google presses Catz on "killing" the Java phone. Catz acknowledges that Ellison was the one who killed the project.
Catz: We decided that we should not make a physical phone.
Now looking at an email from Thomas Kurian (?) to Catz.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.