Google also says these are hearsay documents.
-
-
Google is right. It's definitely fucking weird (and from their perspective, not okay) that they did not get a head's up on this.
-
In trials lawyers are usually trying to be very very careful not to accidentally waive privilege.
-
This is a bizarre case! One side is trying to waive privilege on purpose and the judge won't let them (????)
-
Alsup says it's "not fair to spring this on them" (Google) at the last minute and is not into this.
-
Alsup: What you're showing me has all been cloaked in privilege. Says this should have been disclosed in discovery if they wanted t waive.
-
This is a second go in a four, five year litigation, and yet this trial has been unpredictable
-
Holy shit, the legal background on the Lindholm email is actually insanehttps://bol.bna.com/perspective-oracle-vs-google-trial-highlights-importance-of-privilege-reviews/ …
-
Still fighting over Oracle docs that Google is insisting are privileged + hearsay and can't be used
-
Everything is upside down in this case
-
Jury coming in. Safra Catz is back on the stand.
-
Another stipulation getting read to the jury.
-
Oracle: Can you say what Mr. Schwartz said to you [about the battle with Android]? Objection. Overruled, to be admitted for limited purpose
-
Catz: Mr. Schwartz said it was an unlicensed fork of Java.
-
Catz says that since the acquisition, "hundreds of engineers" have been working on Java to continue to enhance it.
-
Catz: Android has had a very negative effect on Sun-Oracle in many ways.
-
Catz: The whole Java community has been forked; split into two.
-
Catz says "write once; run anywhere" made Java "much more functional" then quickly backpedals and say "sorry, I meant useful."

-
Oracle is trying to enter a doc into evidence on business record exception, Alsup refuses on account that there are "too many slides"
-
Oracle tries to enter a single page from the doc, Alsup looks it over and refuses, says it's still hearsay and not a business record.
-
Catz says Android had "a very negative impact," that companies like Samsung were going from $40 million licensing deals to $1 million.
-
Catz gives the example of how Amazon's Kindle Fire used Android and did not license Java.
-
When Amazon was developing the Paperwhite, it was deciding between (Oracle's) Java and Android. Oracle gave them a 97.5% discount.
-
lol omg
-
Catz: ... releasing a phone did not make sense for us. As far as a phone, we were not in that business, and it didn't make sense for it.
-
As for a phone platform, "Android was so far ahead in the market ... it would be very difficult to compete."
-
Catz testifies that Oracle has been "forced" to make some of their products compatible with Android uhhhhhhhhh
- 171 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.