I think Astrachan is going to chill and see how the rest of this goes
-
-
Oracle bought Sun because so much of their product was based in Java, and they were concerned what would happen if someone else acquired
-
Google objects, thinks Catz is about to say something inflammatory. Alsup: Stick to non-inflammatory things you read.
-
Catz says that they were afraid IBM were going to acquire. Alsup: Okay, that's not inflammatory.
-
If I heard correctly, they were worried a change would impede their use of Java (lololololololol)https://twitter.com/acathrow/status/732292354330267648 …
-
An Oracle press release is being introduced into evidence, Google objects it's hearsay. Oracle says it's a business record.
-
Ruled inadmissible, but Alsup says the witness can probably just testify as to everything that's in it without the document
-
Oracle: Did you buy Sun because you wanted to file a copyright lawsuit against Google? Objection. Overruled. Catz: No, we did not.
-
TBF I think their argument is "If Google wanted to use the APIs, they should have acquired Sun" (lolololololol)https://twitter.com/FioraAeterna/status/732292825165914112 …
-
Catz: Our relationship with the CEO of Sun was... not as good. Alsup: Not as sunny. lol
-
Judge William Haskell Alsup 
-
Almost all of them worked for Google at one point or another, and had some emails that Oracle could yell at them forhttps://twitter.com/cba/status/732294283533811712 …
-
2009 email from Schwartz to Ellison, with Safra Catz cc'd, mentions a "battle with Adobe Flash / Google Android."
-
Alsup says this email is only for showing communication between witness and others, not that there *was* a "battle"
-
Catz: Java was a foundation for our products, and it was very important that we have Java going forward.
-
Catz: One of the key tenets of Java is "write it once, run it anywhere"
-
Catz: Forking breaks apart the community because if you write it for Android, it only runs on Android.
-
Google objects that she is moving into expert testimony on market effects. Oracle says she's just testifying about her understanding at time
-
Yes, THIS IS AN EXTREMELY STRANGE CASEhttps://twitter.com/effigies/status/732296694617018368 …
-
Oracle is presenting "fragmentation" as something Google did that IS WRONG.
-
In other words, for Oracle, the needs of interoperability cut AGAINST fair usepic.twitter.com/MKldgnc97w
-
This is an extremely extremely extremely strange fair use trial!!!!!!!!
-
Brief squabble over a document, Oracle promises Alsup it'll be in non-hearsay shape tomorrow morning.
-
Catz testifies that Android's use of Java APIs was "not okay" with Sun.
-
Sun owned copyright registrations related to the Java platform, and the copyright registrations are now owned by Oracle America.
-
Alsup now reading something to jury about Joshua Bloch. "You remember Dr. Bloch? The energetic witness."
-
Part of Bloch's testimony is to be disregarded.
-
Regarding: the indirect dependency of packages and classes and the Java language specification. Stipulation forthcoming.
-
Jury is out for the day. Catz direct continues tmrw.
-
AHA, yes, Oracle DID move under Rule 50. cc:
@gesmer - 7 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.