Surely that would affect the fair use argument.
-
-
En réponse à @matthew_d_green @sarahjeong
It should! Speaks to factor 2's "nature of the copyrighted work." still, fair use is a straaaange fit
2 réponses 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor @sarahjeong
So at this point if a developer staggers in with irrefutable proof that Java stole the full APIs from his grandfather...
2 réponses 1 Retweet 7 j'aime -
... It would not be relevant to the case? Oracle's ownership of the IP has already been decided?
1 réponse 1 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @matthew_d_green @xor
you know, maybe this is just because I woke up from this nap, but this has me stumped
2 réponses 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
like you're right. this seems relevant. why HASN'T google brought this up?
2 réponses 1 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @matthew_d_green
they'd have to have the full-API-in-grandpa's-attic. Not the individual methods but the SSO that matters.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor @sarahjeong
Still seems like a good way to strengthen the fair use argument. "None of this was even original".
4 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @matthew_d_green @sarahjeong
but Google is doing this a bit. Today Bloch and Bornstein testified on ease of learning Java bc of similarities
3 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor @matthew_d_green
yeah, I just think that going through a bunch of predecessor languages would be really striking
3 réponses 0 Retweet 4 j'aime
almost as striking as Annette Hurst yelling out dessert name alphabetically in court
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.