I think it might just be that there isn't much to say on fair use!
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
There's no way to REALLY hit the four factors because there isn't a lot of evidence that's relevant to fair use determination on either side
6 réponses 3 Retweets 17 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
But like
@danielnazer says, some does go to factor 2 (nature of the work). Still, much of it really focuses on copyrightability issues2 réponses 1 Retweet 12 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This isn't supposed to be a trial about copyrightability but the jury has got to be wondering about it at this point.
1 réponse 4 Retweets 22 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
And especially, especially since Oracle keeps bringing up the nonsensical comparisons to literature and so forth
2 réponses 5 Retweets 16 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Like at some point, you have think, yeah, Google's use of APIs isn't painting or literature, but neither are the APIs to begin with?
3 réponses 8 Retweets 30 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
It's almost like Google's case is "It's fair use because they didn't think APIs were copyrightable"
2 réponses 18 Retweets 37 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Big issue: who bears burden of proof on fair use; 9th Cir has rejected affirmative defense BOP on defendant; yet Alsup sd G has
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
yes, who bears the burden of proof is an appealable issue, but G must raise the issue at the trial court level; did they?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
I'm not sure! I'll have to go back through the docket and see — always a pain, b/c the docket is now at about 1900 entries
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.