And especially, especially since Oracle keeps bringing up the nonsensical comparisons to literature and so forth
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Like at some point, you have think, yeah, Google's use of APIs isn't painting or literature, but neither are the APIs to begin with?
3 réponses 8 Retweets 30 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
It's almost like Google's case is "It's fair use because they didn't think APIs were copyrightable"
2 réponses 18 Retweets 37 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
and Oracle's is "It's not fair use because they DID KNOW the APIs were copyrightable!"
3 réponses 17 Retweets 37 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This may explain Oracle's curious demand to suppress description of previous proceedings from jury in instructions...
1 réponse 0 Retweet 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @MSchruers @sarahjeong
ie., Strategy: re-prove what FedCir already found (copyrightability) & jury will leap right past fair use to infringement.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @MSchruers
it cuts both ways, both Google and Oracle don't want that told to the jury
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @MSchruers
but yeah, that must be what Oracle is thinking
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
agreed it cuts both ways, but if I were P counsel I wouldn't want jury going into delibs thinking I just wasted 900min
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime
lol yeah, and that must be one of the reasons for the brief that got really aggressive with Alsup over the issue.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.