And especially, especially since Oracle keeps bringing up the nonsensical comparisons to literature and so forth
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Like at some point, you have think, yeah, Google's use of APIs isn't painting or literature, but neither are the APIs to begin with?
3 réponses 8 Retweets 30 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
It's almost like Google's case is "It's fair use because they didn't think APIs were copyrightable"
2 réponses 18 Retweets 37 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
and Oracle's is "It's not fair use because they DID KNOW the APIs were copyrightable!"
3 réponses 17 Retweets 37 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This may explain Oracle's curious demand to suppress description of previous proceedings from jury in instructions...
1 réponse 0 Retweet 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @MSchruers @sarahjeong
ie., Strategy: re-prove what FedCir already found (copyrightability) & jury will leap right past fair use to infringement.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @MSchruers
it cuts both ways, both Google and Oracle don't want that told to the jury
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @MSchruers
but yeah, that must be what Oracle is thinking
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong @MSchruers
looking forward to Alsup informing jury about nullification, and their ability to refuse to enforce fed cir view :-p
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime
lmao
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.