Both sides fight over emails where employees opine on whether or not the APIs are copyrightable.
-
-
It's almost like Google's case is "It's fair use because they didn't think APIs were copyrightable"
-
and Oracle's is "It's not fair use because they DID KNOW the APIs were copyrightable!"
-
This. Is. Madness.
-
This may explain Oracle's curious demand to suppress description of previous proceedings from jury in instructions...
-
ie., Strategy: re-prove what FedCir already found (copyrightability) & jury will leap right past fair use to infringement.
-
it cuts both ways, both Google and Oracle don't want that told to the jury
-
but yeah, that must be what Oracle is thinking
-
agreed it cuts both ways, but if I were P counsel I wouldn't want jury going into delibs thinking I just wasted 900min
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
ah, but if they can prove that their API is "beautiful", then it matches the same thing as painting and literature
-
So, what is beauty, after all? *fills-a-library--all-readers-none-the-wiser*
-
if you take current "modern art", any rubbish whatsoever is "beauty". On that scale, Java API is indeed beautiful
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
IMO, spot on! :) Copyrightability is the red herring, so maybe it's better not to act a hungry seagull. ^^
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.