Google pushes on how the API has to be simple, how it's functional, etc.
-
-
Like at some point, you have think, yeah, Google's use of APIs isn't painting or literature, but neither are the APIs to begin with?
-
It's almost like Google's case is "It's fair use because they didn't think APIs were copyrightable"
-
and Oracle's is "It's not fair use because they DID KNOW the APIs were copyrightable!"
-
This. Is. Madness.
-
This may explain Oracle's curious demand to suppress description of previous proceedings from jury in instructions...
-
ie., Strategy: re-prove what FedCir already found (copyrightability) & jury will leap right past fair use to infringement.
-
it cuts both ways, both Google and Oracle don't want that told to the jury
-
but yeah, that must be what Oracle is thinking
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Two novels with different content, tile but with same TOC. Would that constitute copying & cause copyright cases ?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.