Bornstein says it was understood he wasn't giving legal advice.
-
-
En réponse à @xor
Oracle submitting a document for impeachment. Google objects. We'll see where this goes.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
The contested Bornstein email says: "The Classpath code, including the comments, is covered by an incompatible license." (The GPL.)
2 réponses 3 Retweets 9 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
This is very heated. Oracle attorney is basically accusing Bornstein of lying on the stand about how big a factor GPL licensing was.
2 réponses 4 Retweets 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Oof: 2006 email from Bornstein weighs timing as much less a factor than license. Could be expedience then but not what he's saying now.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Another tough Bornstein email: using GPL library was "*probably* OK" in his opinion, but not the "lawyer-informed consensus."
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Having some clarity on whether "API" means declarations or declarations + implementations would really be helpful right now!
4 réponses 5 Retweets 18 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Bornstein explains that calling Java "the j word" in a directive to scrub the code of it was "kind of like a joke."
1 réponse 1 Retweet 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Oracle: Was it your understanding that you didn't own the API and couldn't go around altering it? Bornstein: Yeah, because nobody owned it.
1 réponse 3 Retweets 15 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Oracle atty Annette Hurst is doing an impressive job with tone. Very heated and then very deliberate, really dragging things out.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 5 j'aime
i pray to god i never get cross examined by Annette Hurst
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.