Suggests if a party discloses 2x+30 documents for cross examination where x is the number used for direct, must be disclosed 8 hrs earlier
-
-
and that the authors of the spec license believed the APIs were not copyrightable, "regardless of what the Federal Circuit said years later"
-
Alsup groans, "I don't know about that," like they're rubbing salt into his wounds
-
Alsup wants the parties to "come clean" to the jury that there was already a previous trial. Says it could harm both parties but they should
-
"If they understand the truth, it will not prejudice anyone. But if they don't, it will lead to speculation"
-
That's all for today!
-
@sarahjeong Oh, please. Just make up stuff if you have to, it can't be more unreal than reality
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong what exactly is this argument on? did someone make a motion? -
I think they were going back and forth on a witness testifying that Oracle objects to
-
but this seemed off the beaten path, I'm not sure why it ended up in this place
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.