-
-
En réponse à @xor
We've veered a little close to the "legal advice" that's been verboten in this trial, so we're breaking to discuss without the jury.
1 réponse 2 Retweets 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
A frustrating thing here is that Judge Alsup AND all of computer scientist witnesses know APIs aren't copyrighted. Just: the law disagrees
2 réponses 63 Retweets 70 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
So there's this collective suspension of disbelief. Schwartz can't explain Sun's motivations were based on universally understood truths.
1 réponse 18 Retweets 36 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
We all know APIs are not copyrightable. What the Federal Circuit supposes is: what if they are?
2 réponses 19 Retweets 48 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Schwartz is back on the stand. Google's asking about the Sun deal that never happened.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Schwartz says that there was some pressure on the deal because they knew Google could just build it itself. Oracle objects, Alsup sustains.
2 réponses 2 Retweets 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Coming back to That Blog Post. Schwartz says his blog was a direct means of communicating Sun's positions to the public.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
(Refresher: Blog post congratulates Google on launching Android. Oracle silently deleted it in 2011. Goog says it shows Android was kosher.)
3 réponses 1 Retweet 13 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Schwartz keeps saying "Linux operating system" (because Android was originally dubbed a Java/Linux platform). I twitch and whisper "kernel."
3 réponses 3 Retweets 46 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.