Judge Alsup begrudgingly explains to the jury that APIs are copyrightable—the issue he got reversed on. "It comes to us as a given."
-
-
En réponse à @xor
Google atty asks a question about GNU, and Schwartz explains the recursive acronym. Judge Alsup: "That doesn't make any sense to me."
10 réponses 85 Retweets 173 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Judge asks Schwartz to explain GNU "in 30 seconds." Schwartz starts explaining that "a very smart man started" and the judge cuts him off.
1 réponse 19 Retweets 38 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
"Now you're giving a speech." Schwartz stops with the cadence of a man who has been asked to stop talking about free software before.
3 réponses 89 Retweets 244 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
We've definitely said GNU 3× in a row but the judge does not seem concerned about RMS bursting, Kool-aid Man-style, into the court
4 réponses 115 Retweets 302 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Google asks how Sun felt about GNU Classpath. Schwartz: "I was annoyed, but it was completely consistent with our practices."
2 réponses 5 Retweets 9 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
Parker Higgins a retweeté sarah jeong
Parker Higgins ajouté,
1 réponse 20 Retweets 57 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
We've veered a little close to the "legal advice" that's been verboten in this trial, so we're breaking to discuss without the jury.
1 réponse 2 Retweets 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
A frustrating thing here is that Judge Alsup AND all of computer scientist witnesses know APIs aren't copyrighted. Just: the law disagrees
2 réponses 63 Retweets 70 j'aime
@justkelly_ok @xor you're telling us!
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.