gawker is boned
-
-
@Ugarles ok those were pretty bad but the question to carmichael is some game over bullshit -
@sarahjeong i think it's the same question as asking AJ about personal/professional benefit but grosser because also sexism -
@Ugarles i think it's more indicative of contempt for gawker, which is a bad sign for damages -
@sarahjeong that's an interesting way of thinking about it. i was thinking "is this a way to discount her testimony as biased" -
@sarahjeong because she was a good witness contra all the ways daulerio was glib and bad -
@Ugarles yeah, i read it as contempt for her and her age/experience/gender, and gawker as an institution for putting her in power -
@sarahjeong that's certainly possible if that's the reading Gawker is, as previously mentioned, boned
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.