I went down a PGP rabbit hole last night. This is what I found out about "Satoshi's" PGP keys:http://motherboard.vice.com/read/satoshis-pgp-keys-are-probably-backdated-and-point-to-a-hoax …
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong In 2008, you could use that cipher suite in gpg2, I believe.2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @savagejen
@savagejen interesting. i'm going to have to look into that specifically tomorrow. but w/r/t general gist of the piece, the known key was1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@savagejen generated using gpg 1.4.7 mingw32. does that make a difference?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Well I don't know, but Werner Koch on the gpg mailing list was generating that keylength rsa back in 2007 to benchmark it.2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @savagejen
@sarahjeong It is also not far fetched to believe that the person that designed bitcoin might have a modified version of gpg.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @savagejen
@savagejen do public keys generated through modified versions have the version header at the top?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@savagejen the possibility of a modified version was why i hedged with "probably" and "likely," but only attested key says GPG 1.4.71 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@savagejen and uses different key length & cipher-suites, despite supposedly being created on the same day by the same person
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.