Chuck Johnson responds to Gawker's anti-SLAPP. It's 111 pages long. Part 1: https://popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Chuck-Johnson_v_Gawker_have-you-ever-seen-a-trainwreck-on-paper-part-1.pdf …; 2: https://popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Chuck-Johnson_v_Gawker_have-you-ever-seen-a-trainwreck-on-paper-part-2.pdf …
-
-
-
-
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@sarahjeong@mmasnick anonymous comments are like unpaid internships, therefore ????? no CDA.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh@sarahjeong surprised it took that many pages to mentionhttp://Roommates.com2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @mmasnick
@mmasnick@adamsteinbaugh@sarahjeong 11:30 pm on a Friday and you're reading a legal brief? Y'ALL NEED TO GET A LIFE. '-)2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @TyreJim
@TyreJim@adamsteinbaugh@sarahjeong i can't put it down. this is... astounding.2 réponses 1 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @mmasnick
@mmasnick@TyreJim@adamsteinbaugh are there supposed to be images sporadically embedded that just... aren't?3 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@mmasnick@TyreJim I can't even tell. What page are you looking at?1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh@mmasnick@TyreJim the very beginning. I skipped ahead to 230 though after you mentioned it, and...pic.twitter.com/kUSXNMze8s
1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime
@adamsteinbaugh @mmasnick @TyreJim I just feel like this entire thing is almost definitely written by Chuck C Johnson
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh@TyreJim imagine if he actually HAD received those "secret memos" from ex-Gawkers.0 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.