"reasonable theoretical harm" I... No.
-
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Alright, finally finished. GOOD RULING. Huge. Will be assigned in every copyright law class as mandatory from here on out.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
One thing I want to note— Google Books appears to be inconsistent with UMG v. http://Mp3.com . VERY WEIRD
1 réponse 2 Retweets 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
2nd Cir of course overrides SDNY, so not like it would ever result in a circuit split, but whoa
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I suppose in copyrightland, libraries always win and music startups always lose, but it's a marker of how far we've come since the 00s!
2 réponses 2 Retweets 9 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Clear limits to mass digitization in this case—though I don't think anyone was arguing for something like thispic.twitter.com/OQgPs8Yz20
1 réponse 4 Retweets 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I also love that this decision really nails what people actually use Google Books forpic.twitter.com/3UrMDDJXpy
3 réponses 35 Retweets 38 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
The best copyright law is made by extremely unreasonable plaintiffs. Thank you, Authors Guild, for your service to the public.
2 réponses 51 Retweets 66 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Throwback to HathiTrust last yearpic.twitter.com/tyWELLItur
1 réponse 1 Retweet 8 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.