I take back the bit about conceded Harper & Row 4th factor supremacy. That was to placate SCOTUS
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
that would have been pretty odd tbhpic.twitter.com/8wCu5zzYNf
1 réponse 2 Retweets 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
what in heaven's name is this, why did authors guild argue this claptrappic.twitter.com/wenZxsS2u0
5 réponses 2 Retweets 5 j'aime -
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Alright, finally finished. GOOD RULING. Huge. Will be assigned in every copyright law class as mandatory from here on out.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
One thing I want to note— Google Books appears to be inconsistent with UMG v. http://Mp3.com . VERY WEIRD
1 réponse 2 Retweets 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
2nd Cir of course overrides SDNY, so not like it would ever result in a circuit split, but whoa
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I suppose in copyrightland, libraries always win and music startups always lose, but it's a marker of how far we've come since the 00s!
2 réponses 2 Retweets 9 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I assign http://mp3.com every year (love it!) & imagine if 2006 (& they were less flagrant in copying CD's) maybe win?1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@KyleKCourtney well what's wrong with copying CDs? mass digitization!
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Exactly! Preserving those funny CD's - and laser-discs and Beta and VHS and Nintendo cartridges and floppies and ....0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.