-
-
Alright, finally finished. GOOD RULING. Huge. Will be assigned in every copyright law class as mandatory from here on out.
-
One thing I want to note— Google Books appears to be inconsistent with UMG v. http://Mp3.com . VERY WEIRD
-
2nd Cir of course overrides SDNY, so not like it would ever result in a circuit split, but whoa
-
I suppose in copyrightland, libraries always win and music startups always lose, but it's a marker of how far we've come since the 00s!
-
Clear limits to mass digitization in this case—though I don't think anyone was arguing for something like thispic.twitter.com/OQgPs8Yz20
-
I also love that this decision really nails what people actually use Google Books forpic.twitter.com/3UrMDDJXpy
-
The best copyright law is made by extremely unreasonable plaintiffs. Thank you, Authors Guild, for your service to the public.
-
- Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
@sarahjeong hmm... in other contexts, we'd expect data minimization, efforts to prevent or limit harms from beaches, etc., right? -
@sarahjeong "how will you prevent/limit scope or harm of snaffling?" doesn't seem like an a priori invalid q for digital records stewards
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong omg what if somebody hacks Amazon and makes all the books free??#2spooky4authorsMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.