Chuck C. Johnson's opposition to Gawker's anti-SLAPP motion and motion to dismiss was due before midnight. Nothing listed on the docket.
-
-
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
It *could* have been filed on paper and just not be listed yet. That's unlikely. Failure to respond can mean consent to dismissal.
4 réponses 2 Retweets 9 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
Or he could have *so much evidence* that it's taking forever to upload and his lawyer started at 11:59 p.m.
9 réponses 0 Retweet 18 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh this still warms my heart
09:09 - 10 oct. 2015
1 réponse
0 Retweet
2 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.