Just FYI this week I'm reporting the Matthew Keys trial from the courthouse. Day 1 here: http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-trial-of-matthew-keys-the-journalist-who-allegedly-aided-anonymous-begins … Day 2 post about to go up
-
-
-
En réponse à @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green my understanding is that the defense hinges on (1) he did not intend to cause damage + (2) damage incurred was <5k1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong In the history of CFAA cases has such a defense ever worked?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green I'm going to have to go back and look at the caselaw but it seems like a pretty reasonable theory of the case to me1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@matthew_d_green CFAA jurisdictional minimums are actually pretty controversial (although I only know civil cases w/r/t that specifically)1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Speaking as a random person on Twitter, the cost of verifying that no further damage is possible can be quite high.1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green Oh absolutely. My new article went up btw http://motherboard.vice.com/read/low-level-vandalism-or-high-damage-hacking-day-two-of-the-matthew-keys-trial … maybe this helpspic.twitter.com/p0ucnBrxSz
1 réponse 3 Retweets 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Ouch. Incident response beyond $300-500/hr is insane.4 réponses 2 Retweets 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green yeah and there's also caselaw that says incident response after the fact doesn't count towards the minimum2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@matthew_d_green like, keep in mind that this charge can get you up to 10 years in prison, so those $5k have got to mean something
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.