Couldn't you more cynically describe the situation as "the Happy Birthday lyrics are now orphan works"?
-
-
En réponse à @dispositive
@dispositive@xor Given ownership of a (c) work has to be proved by purported owner, I'd be surprised if anyone could prove (c) claim.2 réponses 1 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @vranieri
@vranieri@dispositive@xor but "unlikely for anyone to prove a copyright claim" isn't the same as public domain1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@dispositive@xor definitely true. But also implicates Rule 11 so.....1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @vranieri
@vranieri@dispositive@xor sorry, not following — insofar as anyone who sues is subject to sanctions because they can't be in a better1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@vranieri@dispositive@xor position than Warner/Chappell?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@dispositive@xor in that lawyers must do diligence and convince themselves they have sufficient proof before filing1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @vranieri
@sarahjeong@dispositive@xor can't just say "I own!" and expect to survive a challenge (esp. b/c this implicates standing to sue)2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @vranieri
@vranieri@dispositive@xor right, but is this enough to declare something in the public domain? or is it, say, a super-orphan work3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@vranieri @dispositive @xor alternately, quasi-public domain
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.