So. How do the other copyright nerds on here feel about the leap from "Warner/Chappell has no copyright interest" to "woo public domain!"
@vranieri @dispositive @xor right, but is this enough to declare something in the public domain? or is it, say, a super-orphan work
-
-
@sarahjeong@vranieri@dispositive it's the Oliver Twist of orphan works -
@xor@sarahjeong@vranieri@dispositive It's not just presuming there's no other Ps. The discussion of digestive publication is the thing. -
@xor@sarahjeong@vranieri@dispositive Note that the court can't reach a determination at SJ there, but there's every indication… -
@xor@sarahjeong@vranieri@dispositive that Plaintiffs would prevail before a fact-finder. Hard to argue Summy lacked permission. -
@SherwinPK@sarahjeong@vranieri@dispositive this is a good point -
@xor@SherwinPK@sarahjeong@dispositive would have to rely on "but, but maybe not!" as arg in response.... not very persuasive -
@vranieri@xor@sarahjeong@dispositive Preponderance.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@vranieri@dispositive@xor alternately, quasi-public domainMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@dispositive@xor can we *ever* declare anything in the public domain then? E.g. what proof that Shakespeare auth'd publication?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.