Then he talks anti-trust, when IP is an authorized government monopoly?
-
-
-
He got the bit about patent so right but he still hedges, and then he doesn't mention copyright at all.
-
Likely because thorny issues around copyright law policy, lobbying, and corruption don't really support a "tech companies bad" narrative
-
And then he mentions ebook sales and monopolies, but without mention of DRM / 1201.
-
Perhaps the truth of it is that the monopolies we see in tech are aided by laws bought by a previous, still-active generation of monopolists
-
and actually, that large IP lawsuits levied against technology companies have a significant chill on smaller entrants in the marketplace
-
and I'm just talking about IP here because it's my wheelhouse. I also wonder to what extent the rise of Amazon is reliant on previous steps
-
Would I still be inclined to order toilet paper off Amazon if it weren't that there's only *really* 3 manufacturers of toilet paper
-
2 of which are owned by the Koch brothers, with the 1 remaining owned by Satan AND the Koch brothers
- 3 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong pointer to the piece? I must not be looking in the right place.s -
@sarahjeong you’re right. focus on patents without talking about terms of use, copyright, DRM, locked-in data misses much of the point.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Yrs ago i mused at a dinner party that the society would break down over water scarcity. Prof said, no, it'll be over IP. o_OMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong Reich's an economist, not an attorney ;-)Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.