And maybe you don't! Maybe that's the point at which DMCA laziness is beyond the pale.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
But the 9th circuit decision doesn't do much to curb laziness, which plagues the present system much more than intentional censorship.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
This epidemic of DMCA laziness is part of the driving force around proactive systems like Content ID.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Because DMCA laziness is so extreme, platform-side detection-and-licensing means fewer takedowns for users entirely.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
But Content ID has a huge toll on users in the long run, and it's a false choice being enabled by an imbalance in § 512.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
At this point, the § 512 imbalance is so far gone I wonder if any revival of 512(f) could possibly rectify the situation.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
But in any case, (f) was intended as Congress's counterbalance, and it's defunct. The canary in the coal mine has been dead for years.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong what of 512(g)’s role in this balancing act?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @occamsraza
@panjwaniPK My understanding is we don't really have any stats on people who aren't sophisticated enough to fight it/ get lost in the cracks1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@panjwaniPK and anecdotally speaking, there seem to be a fair number1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@panjwaniPK imo 512(g) keeps 512 from running afoul of 1A, rather than calibrating any balance of power
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.