This, of course, goes as far as targeting entirely unrelated works, which is undisputedly a misrepresentation, regardless of fair use
-
-
-
By sticking to the Rossi subjective belief req, it's becomes *really* hard to show that something that's painfully obvious to the layperson
-
When a list of "infringing" URLs includes 127.0.0.1, do you still have to ask a jury whether a proper subjective belief was formed?
-
And maybe you don't! Maybe that's the point at which DMCA laziness is beyond the pale.
-
But the 9th circuit decision doesn't do much to curb laziness, which plagues the present system much more than intentional censorship.
-
This epidemic of DMCA laziness is part of the driving force around proactive systems like Content ID.
-
Because DMCA laziness is so extreme, platform-side detection-and-licensing means fewer takedowns for users entirely.
-
But Content ID has a huge toll on users in the long run, and it's a false choice being enabled by an imbalance in § 512.
-
At this point, the § 512 imbalance is so far gone I wonder if any revival of 512(f) could possibly rectify the situation.
-
But in any case, (f) was intended as Congress's counterbalance, and it's defunct. The canary in the coal mine has been dead for years.
- 4 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.