I hope you didn't think I was JOKING when I said I'd talk about the Lenz decision for the next five hours
-
-
@sarahjeong what i dislike the most is the 'nominal damages' part, eliminating almost any disincentive to take downs of noncommercial vids -
@Ugarles attorneys fees question is reopened, I think Ninth Circuit decision is a huge improvement from district court -
@Ugarles the district court decision barred attorneys fees from after filing the lawsuit entirely -
@sarahjeong that's good but since that doesn't benefit the fair-user, it's p. much only good for the class action plantiffs' bar. -
@sarahjeong or EFF, I guess, if they want to make a business a sideline in suing over the worst abuses -
@Ugarles I think there's a significant pool of private practitioners that would like to put in pro bono hours for egregious abuses -
@Ugarles I'm not saying this would solve the abysmal state of fair use on the internet but I think it would chill the volume of DMCA notices -
@sarahjeong inshallah - though i'm not optimistic given the way the entertainment industry usually operates
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong I do, but haven't even had time to read your article yet, much less the whole ruling :( -
@tieguy might I venture to guess it won't take nearly as long to read my article
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong So, can we revisit tortious interference after this?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong when do I need to schedule the intervention?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.