I also really wanted to write about footnote 4 after @andy_sellars pointed it out but that seemed too wonky even for what I usually do
-
-
honestly the happy noises about Lenz v. Universal are really just a sign of dismally lowered expectations over the last 8 years
-
does anyone want to talk more about Lenz
-
@sarahjeong what i dislike the most is the 'nominal damages' part, eliminating almost any disincentive to take downs of noncommercial vids -
@Ugarles attorneys fees question is reopened, I think Ninth Circuit decision is a huge improvement from district court -
@Ugarles the district court decision barred attorneys fees from after filing the lawsuit entirely -
@sarahjeong that's good but since that doesn't benefit the fair-user, it's p. much only good for the class action plantiffs' bar. -
@sarahjeong or EFF, I guess, if they want to make a business a sideline in suing over the worst abuses -
@Ugarles I think there's a significant pool of private practitioners that would like to put in pro bono hours for egregious abuses - 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong dammit. are you going to make me write about this footnote now? -
@mmasnick mike am i going to have to rant about lenz for the next (glances at watch) four hours and fifteen minutes alone - 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.