I filed before I saw the MPAA's statement:https://twitter.com/eriqgardner/status/643513207102001152 …
-
-
-
which basically confirms my eeyore-feelings
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I also really wanted to write about footnote 4 after
@andy_sellars pointed it out but that seemed too wonky even for what I usually do -
-
I hope you didn't think I was JOKING when I said I'd talk about the Lenz decision for the next five hours
-
I would honestly be quite shocked if the "fair use is not infringement" line resulted in a change to common procedural posture
-
is this the world I dream of? yes. is this the world I foresee? no.
-
One thing that does bum me out is that the description of what a fair use compliant algorithm would be is taken from a pro-fair use paper
-
and it's honestly the most weaksauce shit ever (apologies to the writers)
-
we're handing over to robots systems that were calibrated with human judges as arbitrators
- 13 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong stg until i finally clicked on this i was sure you were talking about this dancing baby the whole timepic.twitter.com/lVivFHF4MF -
@ElizSimins everyone thinks that -
@sarahjeong ugh even my mistakes are cliched
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Why is this not Fair Use through a Warped LenzMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong fair use analogy was aceMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Hey
@sarahjeong I just read your take and will vlog my response. But FYI, YouTube now informs you if a takedown was manual -
That
@sarahjeong is one signal that a "bot' was not completely involved in a takedown. Where human action is evident, the video maker...
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.