@adamsteinbaugh No, the beginning killed it for me. Procedurally, it's the opposite of what Lenz is seeking.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@adamsteinbaugh There's some great language about fair use as a defense, and the damages thing is good, but everything else is poop2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong that one can have a subjective good faith belief about fair use without looking at the content itself seems... bad.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh Which page? I thought they *do* have to look at the content? (Although still have a subjective belief)1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I may be reading too much into it, but page 18, "We follow Rossi's guidance..."1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh I see what you mean. The Cf at the end of that graf is really interesting though1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
-
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh Yeah I don't like this case.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh um, this is strangely relevant to an abuse issue i'm working on. can you explain?2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@randileeharper @adamsteinbaugh I'm writing now.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.