Hey guys, I don't think the Lenz decision is actually good.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I would have liked to see a departure from Rossi, but do you see worse things than that?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @andy_sellars
@andy_sellars Rossi is the big one but just look at the procedural stance. If Lenz can't win on summary judgment, no one can. 512f is dead.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@andy_sellars I mean, it's been dead, but now it gets to stay dead1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I’d have to look at the facts again to see, but I take your point. Damages could give this life, and that’s a mixed win.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @andy_sellars
@andy_sellars The damages part is a big deal. I'm very pleased to see that.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @andy_sellars
@sarahjeong But dicta around the core issue and a reaffirmation of Diebold’s good language are very welcome, esp. after the 2013 opinion.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @andy_sellars
@andy_sellars Agree, but I'd also argue that the Diebold / Lenz threat model is largely irrelevant in the age of the robot-takedown2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Yep - I think page 19 is going to be litigated again.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@andy_sellars Maybe in eight years lol
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong $10 if you can get Lenz’s kid to comment on the decision.2 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.