@sarahjeong 'Gross' isn't really in my active vocabulary, but the utilitarian win is to make that comparison as often as possible.
-
-
En réponse à @topynate
@sarahjeong I.e. your approach won't have an effect on someone who'd choose to go after someone like Foy; perhaps comparing to Sacco will.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@topynate "It sucks that Sacco, a PR pro, lost her job for making a public racist remark, ergo it must suck to put Foy in jail"2 réponses 1 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong That is pretty much the opposite of what I was saying, which was not to make that cui bono judgement.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @topynate
@sarahjeong Because different people will reach different judgements, whether you like it or not. But a general principle of online>1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @topynate
@sarahjeong >behaviour has a better chance of buy-in.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@topynate What I'm getting at is that what happened to Sacco was not that bad and white America's obsession with her is deeply telling.37 réponses 41 Retweets 29 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@topynate What YOU'RE getting at is "If you think getting jailed for a tweet is bad, next time don't drag Sacco,"2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@topynate because you fail to question a false equivalence that is deeply harmful to our social understanding of online violence.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong @topynate
There is no such thing as "online violence" and you are a bigot.
2 réponses 2 Retweets 40 j'aime - 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.