As a Law Review executive board survivor—I cannot help but ask: Why didn't a single editor question this article? http://abovethelaw.com/2015/08/law-journal-apologizes-for-article-about-executing-law-professors-he-resigns/?show=comments#comments …
-
-
@sarahjeong it's insane no one said..."maybe this is a BAD idea?" -
@wbm312@sarahjeong Truth is, nobody even read it. They were too focused on Bluebooking and finding support for universally accepted facts. -
@copiesofcopies@sarahjeong Someone had to read it to select it... but probably true... -
@wbm312@copiesofcopies@sarahjeong I guess EIC did read it, just has horrible judgment. From https://www.nslj.org/wp-content/uploads/Betrayal-of-Rational-Argument.pdf …pic.twitter.com/UmPpx7aDUT
-
@wbm312@copiesofcopies@sarahjeong next paragraph is delightfully direct.pic.twitter.com/LZvKDviZmR
-
@mindspillage@copiesofcopies@sarahjeong last two paragraphs slam the editors for poor judgement. -
@wbm312@mindspillage@copiesofcopies I need to finish reading the Bradford article I guess - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@wbm312 HOW DID THAT GET PUBLISHED -
@sarahjeong the apology from the editorial board subtly blames it on their predecessors... -
@wbm312 that still doesn't answer the question of "how did that get published" -
@sarahjeong that's a question I'm not sure anyone can answer, because I cannot fathom how it was even selected... -
@wbm312@sarahjeong articles staffer slacking & recommends w/o reading, articles editor blindly accepts rec, copyed. bluebook/spelling only? -
@mindspillage@sarahjeong maybe? Favorite line so far is this one (pg. 297):pic.twitter.com/ts6s17ztlS
-
@wbm312@sarahjeong also GMUSL is weird. One thing I truly enjoyed there was learning far-right positions from people who in fact hold them.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.